Tag Archives: history

735. In the Middle

I grew up in a firmly Republican household. Democrats were fools and maybe pinkos. (It was the fifties.) Black marchers in the deep South were just outside agitators from the North.

Watching people being firehosed for asking to be treated as humans convinced me that the last part was wrong. Just observing the world convinced me that the first part was wrong.

But it didn’t make me a Democrat. Just because X is wrong, that doesn’t mean Y is right.

My background does make me want to scream when some talking head says that were are “so polarized, more than we ever have been.” Really? Perhaps they should read a history book. America has always been polarized. We even fought a war over our polarization back in the 1860s.

When my parents hated Democrats, and Democrats probably hated my parents, they were just being the same kind of abrasive American we have always been.

So I have chosen to be neither an Elephant nor a Donkey, just a stubborn schmuck who listens to both sides.

Let me put that in the fewest possible words:

Every opinion has another set against it.
Learn only one opinion, and you think you know everything.
Learn the other and you find yourself right back to knowing nothing.

As Spock said to Kirk, “The answer probably lies somwhere in the middle.” But where in the middle? That’s the hard part, and it is up to you to figure it out.

That is, unless you want to stamp a Donkey or and Elephant on your forehead and stop thinking altogether.

733. American Peasants

The semiquincentennial has passed. The fireworks are all over and the futile attempts to summarize 250 years in an hour are mostly over. 

America’s 250th birthday was too big an event to capture in a post, so I didn’t try. Instead, here is my American story — a thumbnail view of the last 150 years of my own family.

We were American entrepreneurs.

We were American peasants.

Both statements are true. The three generations I know well were part of capitalist America, with all its potential for success and failure. We (my grandfather, father, and I — until I escaped to college) were also farmers, which placed us at the mercy of the weather and of market conditions.

My father, if he were alive today, would be 100 years old.

My paternal grandfather, if he were alive today, would be 152.

My age? Never mind, but the three generations of us have seen a lot of history.

Between them, my paternal grandparents had twelve children. The first died in infancy, the last was stillborn. That isn’t a bad record for a time when most diseases were incurable. The eldest surviving children were mostly married and on their own by the time the youngest arrived.

My grandfather came to Oklahoma when it was still Indian Territory. So did my grandmother. They married there in 1902; Oklahoma became a state in 1907.

Their first house was without plumbing or running water. That was typical. Like most people of that era, they were farmers. Thirty years later they survived the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression, largely because they lived in the far north-eastern part of the state, on the edge of the Ozarks, which had less drought and fewer dust storms.

They lived their lives on a family farm. That is a phrase that brings a feeling of nostalgia to people who have never lived on one. It is actually an institution which survives on unpaid child labor.

When World War II began, their three youngest children — my father along with his older and younger brothers — were ripe for the draft. The eldest of the three volunteered, my father was drafted, but given a brief deferment to get in my grandfather’s crops for that year, and the youngest was drafted as soon as he was old enough.

They all returned alive. Their military stories are worth telling, but at another time.

Back from the war, my father married quickly. My parent’s first house was a converted chicken coop. Before the great expansion of suburban housing began, anything that had four walls and a roof was fair game for returning GIs. My father bought a milk truck and drove a route for the next several years, saving his money and buying dairy cows, which he housed on his brother’s farm.

Forget a city milk delivery cart, drawn by a faithful horse. Forget the stainless steel behemoths that you see on today’s roads. In those days, milk was transported in 10 gallon cans which were stored on the farm in a frigid water bath. Each milk can, with contents, weighed about a hundred pounds. They were picked up daily from each farm by milkmen who hoisted all of them manually, one by one, out of the cold tank, carried them outside to their refrigerated truck, hoisted them by hand to the high bed, then drove the the next farm. When the load was complete, they drove them to Tulsa and unloaded them, still by hand. It was a brutal business. 

After four years my father sold the truck and we all moved to a house (you would call it a shack) on my uncle’s farm. It had no plumbing, just an outhouse, and our water came from a milkman like my father had been.  He picked up milk from my father’s and uncle’s combined herd every day. When he unloaded his truck, he rinsed out one of the milk cans and filled it with city water. The next day it came back with the empties; we placed it on the counter in the kitchen. It provided 10 gallons a day for all uses.

No one paid for the water and no one paid the milkman for bringing it back from town. It was just a kindness among people during hard times.

After four years of living on my uncle’s farm and growing crops on rented land, we moved again, this time to our own place. It wasn’t much, and it was rented, but we worked together to fix it up. I did what I could; I was seven.

When I was eleven, I started working every day, twice a day, in the dairy barn. That continued until I was nineteen and went off to college. I also spent every day of summer driving a tractor, as well as many days in spring and fall. I once calculated that in winter I worked the farm about 35 hours a week, and in summer, closer to 50.

About the time I started working, we bought the farm from its owner, with a bank loan of course.

For about eight years, my father had my full, free labor. By the time I was fourteen I could drive a tractor as well as anyone and I competed with grown men to prove I could carry as many sacks of grain or fertilizer as they could. 

That’s the way boys grow up on a farm. Childhood? I didn’t have much of one, but I didn’t feel particularly cheated. I was a man at fifteen, and that was enough.

Still, I wouldn’t do it again for a billion dollars.

I left the farm in 1966 and, for reasons having nothing to do with this post, I only returned for brief visits.

The Great American Lie is that if you work hard enough, you will succeed. My father sought success and won it, to a degree. That is the entrepreneurial part of my family story.

Things didn’t go quite as well after I left, and then his life of immense labor finally caught up with him. His health failed. He could no longer do the work it takes to run a working farm, and there was not enough income to hire someone to take his place. Or mine. He could no longer pay the bank loan.

The bank took the farm.

Bill Gates and Elon Musk notwithstanding, that is the normal end of a business, or a farm. It is especially true when the children want out.

After a life of work and sacrifice, everything is lost when a man’s strength runs out — a peasant from the middle ages would have understood the situation perfectly.

732. Rebecca Wasson


O beautiful young republic for whom my John and I
Gave all of our strength and love!

The two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of America is nearly upon us. Great things have been done by great people, but I always find myself more interested in those who never made the news, nor the history books. Edgar Lee Master’s must have felt the same way, to judge by his book of poems Spoon River Anthology.

The people that spoke from that town’s cemetery, through Master’s pen, a century ago, have a lot to say to the rest of us. I am particularly moved by Rebecca Wasson, a hundred years old, remembering in her quiet room, and waiting for her husband’s return, which can only come at her very end.

Rebecca Wasson

Spring and Summer, Fall and Winter and Spring,
After each other drifting, past my window drifting
And I lay so many years watching them drift and counting
The years till a terror came in my heart at times,
With the feeling that I had become eternal; at last
My hundredth year was reached! And still I lay
Hearing the tick of the clock, and the low of cattle
And the scream of a jay flying through falling leaves!
Day after day alone in a room of the house
Of a daughter-in-law stricken with age and gray.
And by night, or looking out of the window by day
My thought ran back, it seemed, through infinite time
To North Carolina and all my girlhood days,
And John, my John, away to the war with the British,
And all the children, the deaths, and all the sorrows.
And that stretch of years like a prairie in Illinois
Through which great figures passed like hurrying horsemen,
Washington, Jefferson, Jackson, Webster, Clay.
O beautiful young republic for whom my John and I
Gave all of our strength and love!
And O my John!
Why, when I lay so helpless in bed for years,
Praying for you to come, was your coming delayed?
Seeing that with a cry of rapture, like that I uttered
When you found me in old Virginia after the war,
I cried when I beheld you there by the bed,
As the sun stood low in the west growing smaller and fainter
In the light of your face!

725. Steampunk, Maybe Not

If you didn’t read last week’s post, you should do that first. The picture above is a modern enthusiast’s model of Ofeldt’s invention, explained below.

I occasionally keep a digital diary of what I am writing. If I were better at remembering to make entries, my rearward vision would be clearer. This comes from the entries I made in the last half of 2017.

FYI, Durbar is an Indian term for a ceremony of submission to a Raja, which was later taken up by the British. That is real-world information.

— << >> —

The idea for the Durbar novel came at Westercon 70, July 4 weekend 2017. I began plotting as soon as I returned home, but failed to note the day I started writing. I finished the last chapter at 2:32 PM Monday, Oct. 23, 2017.

I sent completed novel, now titled The Cost of Empire, to Gollancz in London on January 2, 2018. On that same day, I began the first page of a novel with the working title Clockwork Christmas.

— << >> —

Clockwork Christmas later became Like Clockwork. We’ll talk about it another time.

2017 and 2018 were exciting years. It was as if the old days were back.

I had spent fifty years on the ever growing Menhir series, half as long as that working out the kinks in Cyan, and the other books I wrote during those middle years were completed in off hours while I was a working school teacher. Now I was free to write without day-job constraints, and things flowed freely again like they had when I first began.

What? You just want to know about the secret weapon
I mentioned last week?

No, I haven’t forgotten. Britain, in the novel The Cost of Empire, had a secret weapon called the McFarland engine. Our hero discovers that the McFarland engine was stolen from a Swedish-American inventor named Frank Ofeldt.

Ofeldt and his invention are part of our real world, and I already knew about him when I had my epiphany in Tempe. He is deeply obscure and his invention was silly, but it provided the perfect catalyst when The Cost of Empire burst into my consciousness. I would never have heard of him, except for my incessant reading in maritime history.

Ofeldt’s invention in the real world. Ofeldt perfected the naphtha engine, which is somewhere between a steam engine and an internal combustion engine. Naphtha (if you were my age I would just say lighter fluid and you would know what I mean) is heated and the naphtha engine uses it as a steam engine uses steam, to move pistons. Even though naphtha is combustible, it doesn’t burn at this stage.

The naphtha is recovered after passing through the pistons, cooled back to a liquid, then burned to heat incoming naphtha. The resulting engine was both weak and dangerous. It should have disappeared from history. Instead, the Federal government saved it — by accident.

The Feds passed a law forbidding steam engines on boats without a licensed operator. The newly rich of the nineteenth century often had twenty foot launches powered by miniature steam engines that they used to carry their rich friends around their private lakes. Suddenly they were illegal. Naphtha engines were not technically “steam” engines so they found a niche market and survived, at least for a few decades.

Ofeldt’s invention in the novel. Steam dirigibles existed early on, in the real world and in the novel. They were never practical because of the weight of water and coal they had to carry. In the novel, internal combustion engine technology had been deliberately suppressed. McFarland discovered Ofeldt’s invention, stole it, and produced functioning, if underpowered, fleet of British dirigibles.

i wrapped all of the other technologies in the novel around the naphtha engine. Our hero is a young airman in the British dirigible fleet who discovers the existence of the spy ring, the theft of Ofeldt’s invention, and the crippling blow that the engine’s weakness inflicts on British security. All this occurs while he is trying to understand why Britain won the German War, but is still the most powerful and hated nation on Earth.

— << >> —

If there is a moral here, it must be that nothing you know is useless, no time spent off task is really off task to a writer’s ravenous subconscious, and if a piece of knowledge is obscure, that just means that you get first crack at using it.

None of this answers the questions implied in the titles of these two posts. Is it really steampunk? Probably not.

I wrote The Cost of Empire and Like Clockwork in search of steampunk. When they were finished The Cost of Empire would probably fit better into the sister category of alternate universes. And Like Clockwork would probably be viewed as a classic time travel story.

Well, they both taste like steampunk to me, and categories are ultimately just a book seller’s concern.

The Cost of Empire
will be published next year
on
May 12, 2027

Like Clockwork is too far down the queue of completed novels to promise its date of publication at this time.

724. Steampunk, Maybe

Sometime about 2005 I found Kenneth Oppel’s Airborn at a book fair where I was teaching. It appealed to me, enough to think about writing something similar. It was classified as steampunk, a term I had not yet encountered.

I started looking around to find out what this steampunk was, and found the answer confusing. There were dirigibles everywhere in steampunk-world, but you were more likely to run into Jack the Ripper than airmen at work. The fantasy/horror end of the steampunk continuum was not to my liking.

I had plenty of straight fantasy and straight science fiction on my plate, so steampunk dropped down to the bottom of my consciousness where it would remain until the stars alligned, astronomically or astrologically.

That happened in 2017. Cyan had recently been published and I was a speaker at Westercon 70 in Tempe, Arizona. I decided to look in on every panel that had anything to do with steampunk. I wasn’t about to miss my chance to learn from the authors who were actually writing in the sub-genre.

I didn’t find many definiitons; in fact, there didn’t seem to be any boundaries. It seems that steampunk is a culture, or an aesthetic. (As opposed to an anesthetic, which a lot of accepted literature is.) Or maybe it was just a bunch of people having a fun return to the literature of their childhoods. For some, that meant Jules Verne; for others, Frankenstein.

It seemed to be a revisiting of the wonders and  horrors of science, when science was in its infancy. Most of the writers seemed to bunch up at the ends of the continuum — either Verniers or Steiners. I clearly belonged to the Vernier camp.

(Yes, I know Verniers or Steiners is a bad joke, but steampunk is a frequently lighthearted thing, and I’m in a mood today. Get over it.)

I visited a bunch of steampunk related panels, but all I found out about boundaries was that there aren’t any. I liked a lot of what I heard, but I couldn’t find my own place in steampunk. Then I visited a panel called The Science of Steampunk: What Makes the Gears Go Round?

The panel was divided between Verniers and Steiners, all of whom were steampunk authors. The Steiners had less to say, and looked a little bored. I concluded that they really didn’t care much what made the gears go round, as long as they had fun spinning them. The Verniers were looking for “real world” connections.

A series of speculative questions was put to the panel, including, “What real world changes could have kept steam power dominant further into the future?” No one had any great ideas. I suggested from the audience that a country with much coal and no oil would continue using steam for economic reasons.

That’s a probable scenario, but not brillant deduction. Then a bomb went off in my head.

What if that country were Britain?

What if WWI had happend early?

What if British efforts in that war had included an organization of spies, saboteurs, and assassins?

What if that group had assassinated Nikolaus Otto, Gottleib Daimler, and Rudolf Diesel, delaying the adoption of an internal combustion engine, and what if they had continuously sabotaged Zepplin’s work, while stealing his ideas?

What if Britain had another secret weapon, a real-world invention that has been forgotten by the real world?

Now I don’t mean to tell you that all of that came into my consciousness in a heartbeat, but the embryo of it did. I knew the real world situation circa 1860 — 1910 from studying history, including knowledge of the four critical German scientists and inventors.

I also knew about their secret weapon, and it is extremely obscure.

Also silly.

Also an example of a well intentioned law that made a situation worse.

However, that secret weapon could lead to a world where Britain, not Germany, had dirigibles, ruled the world, and was hated by everybody.

It was time to start writing, but I still had a question. Was this novel going to really be  steampunk?

We can talk about that next time, while I am telling you about the secret weapon.

more next week

723. Humanity

 

Humanity

When it becomes too lonely to be “I”,
All the “I”s become “we”.
That is the beginning of culture.

Being “we” creates “them”.
That is the beginning of war

There were no blacks until white men created them.
They were just people of a darker complexion
on another continent, going about their lives.

Then they were captured,
bound, transported, and reborn in another land.
Abused, held down, tormented, and therefore feared.

Made into a new people.

It didn’t matter that they came from the Bushveld or Karoo,
The Swahili Coast or the Congo, Kalahari or Natal . . .
White people mashed all the Africans into one lump
and called them n—–.

We don’t use that word any more,
but we use the same thinking.

There were no Indians until the whites arrived.
No Native Americans, either.

(Native Americans!
Named after an arrogant map maker,
instead of a mistake made by an Italian
working for the Spanish
who never did know where he was.)

Before European explorers came
There were Apache and Blackfeet, Cheyenne and Dakota,
Hopi and Kickapoo, Kiowa and Mi’kmaq,
Osage and Paiute, Quapaw and Chippewa.

Hundreds of little groups, at war with one another.
Each the center of their own universe,
until they became one people in the eyes of the Europeans.

But that’s not all.

There were no Whites in Europe, either.
They didn’t become Whites until they reached America.

In Europe they were French and Polish,
Italian and Greek,
Russian and Romanian,
English, Welsh, Scottish, and Irish,
Gypsies and Danes.

They hated each other,
They fought with each other, they killed each other.
There was no unity in Europe either.

“Unity” came everywhere
when the little groups became bigger groups,
usually against their will.

It happens on our side,
It happens on their side, too.
And then we fight.

Do we have to wait for the flying saucers to land,
and give us a common enemy?

Will it take that to force humans
to become humanity?

722. Index to Learning from the Masters

My job should be to write books and leave the teases, the blurbs, and the come-ons to the publisher, but life never did give anyone what he wanted without some pain attached. Self-publishing is basically everything I never wanted. Oh, well.

 

Since I have to tease to get readers, I intend to do it well. Last week I told you about Learning from the Masters which will be coming out in about a year.

Here is an even better tease — the index. 

Yes, I know that is a ridiculous amount of scrolling, but its a large book full of small essays.   

IT STARTED WITH POETRY
Discovering Khyyam

HEINLEIN
Lost Legacy
The Three Stages of Heinlein
Heinlein’s Harems
What’s in a Name: Heinlein characters
RAH and Methuselah’s Children
Heinlein and the Hippies
Opposite visions: Starship and Stranger
Time Enough for Love
Five by Heinlein
RAH: The Man Who Sold the Moon
The Number of the Beast

THE OTHER OLD MASTERS OF SFF
Worlds of Ursula K. Le Guin
Harlan Ellison
Asimov’s Good Life
Arthur C. Clarke: The Two Diaspars
Arthur C. Clarke Invents the Modern World
Arthur C. Clarke and Russia
The Geosynchronous Arthur C. Clarke
J. G. Ballard’s Coral D
Roger Zelazny: Doorways in the Sand
     and Isle of the Dead
Two Times Gordon Dickson
Randall Garrett’s Lord Darcy
Jean Lorrah: Vulcan Academy Murders
Jean Lorrah: The IDIC Epidemic

CLASSICS, MOSTLY
Bob Dylan, Nobel Laureate
A Guest Editorial by Mark Twain
The American by Howard Fast
Books About Books
Great (?) Books
Lost Classics
More Weight: Arthur Miller’s Crucible
The Great American Read
What Moved You on the GAR?

STORIES THAT SING
Fifteen Stories
Ernest Hemingway: The Old Man and the Sea
Keith Roberts: Pavane
A Life of Reading
Richard Cowper: The Road to Corlay
Richard McKenna: Hunter, Come Home
E. E. Smith: The Lensmen Series
Roger Zelazny: Jack of Shadows
Edgar Pangborn: Davy
John Brunner: The Traveler in Black
Sharyn McCrumb: Highland Laddie Gone
John Buchan: A Prince of the Captivity
Erskine Childers: The Riddle of the Sands
Homage to Robert Louis Stevenson
Stevenson’s Kidnapped
Stevenson’s Catriona

DETECTIVES, WESTERNS, AND OTHER GENRES
Mentors in Detection
G. K. Chesterton: Father Brown
Andrew Greeley: Father Blackie Ryan
John D. MacDonald: The Green Ripper
John D. MacDonald: Travis McGee’s Women
Alistair Maclean: The Black Shrike
S. S. Van Dine: The Benson Murder Case
John Buchan: the Hannay Novels
The Thirty-nine Steps
Greenmantle
Mr. Sandfast
Three Hostages
Island of Sheep
John Gierach (What? You’ve Never Heard of Him?)
Looking for Louis L’Amour
Louis L’Amour: The Education of a
Wandering Man
Louis L’Amour: Wandering Quotes
A Perfect Book
And Finally, The Worst Story Ever Told

JUVENILES, MOSTLY SCIENCE FICTION
Apprentice Literature
Boys at Work: Lee Corey
Boys at Work: Howard Pease
Boys at Work: Harold Goodwin’s Rick Brant
Thank You, Harold Goodwin
Who Is This Harold Goodwin
Heinlein’s Starman Jones
Heinlein’s Time for the Stars
Heinlein’s Textbook: The Rolling Stones
Andre Norton: Science Fiction in the Wild
Andre Norton: At Sword’s Point
Andre Norton: Sword Trilogy
Andre Norton: Star Gate
Andre Norton: Beast Master
Guilt: Willard Price’s Underwater Adventure
Two Hands and a Knife
Donald A. Wollheim’s Mike Mars
Great Books for Kids
The Green Hills of Mars

NEW OR NEW TO ME
JM Williams: In the Valley of Magic
JM Williams: The Nightingale
Sturgeon and Steampunk
Michael Tierney’s To Rule the Sky
A PhD in Steampunk: Michael Perschon
Marsheila Rockwell’s Bridges of Longing
Small Gods, Big Issues — Terry Pratchett
Lots of Love  (Nazareth)
A Late Arrival

AND IT ENDS WITH POETRY
Spoon River Anthology

720. Where Good Men Have Gone Before

I never thought it would happen, but NASA proved me wrong. Good for them.

I was a space enthusiast from age 10, when space was impossible. I never lost my fervor. Coming home from our honeymoon a decade later, my wife and I went to her old college dorm to find a television and watched the Apollo 11 landing, surrounded by a crowd of enthusiasts.

Three and half years later, the glory was over. Manned exploration was over. We flew space shuttles, but only in low Earth orbit. We built a space station — two actually, and the Russians built many. Still, manned exploration was over. We were not-so-boldly going where Mercury and Gemini had gone before, but nobody was going where Apollo had so recently gone.

Then came NASP, Venturestar, and Project Constellation, phantom programs that promised new explorations, but died stillborn. By the time Constellation morphed into Artemis, I had given up — not on space exploration, but on the politicians who make it happen. Or don’t make it happen.

<< — >>

The rest is part of a post I wrote 45 years after the liftoff of the last Saturn. These were Gene Cernan’s words on leaving the moon at the end of Apollo 17.

“We leave as we came, and, God willing, we shall return, with peace and hope for all mankind.” 

<< — >>

On December 7, 1972, at 12:33 AM Eastern Time, the last manned moon flight took off from Cape Canaveral.

Apollo was a stunt from the get-go. Kennedy’s speech set a goal of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth within the decade. If we had failed, it would be laughed at today as just another empty promise made by a politician.

One man laid down the challenge and thousands of men and women carried out the promise.

But it was still a stunt. When Kennedy made his speech on May 25, 1961, Russia had put a man into orbit. We had not, although we had managed a sub-orbital flight. NASA had only been in existence for three years. By any real or imagined yardstick, the Russians were far ahead in space.

By herculean efforts, NASA forged ahead through Mercury and Gemini. The fire aboard “Apollo One” set American efforts back significantly, and when launches began again, it looked like the Russians were going to land on the moon first.

Something had to be done. That something was the Apollo 8 journey to and around the moon, without a lander, for the Christmas season of 1968. We could claim to have been to the moon first (by an ad-man’s stretch of the truth), even if the Soviets became the first to land.

The Russian program faltered. Apollo 11 landed a man safely on the moon, and returned him safely to the Earth.

Now what?

For the Soviets, the answer was to turn away from the moon. Their N-1 mega-rocket had failed, and their manned modules and lander were stored away. The Soviets began a series of long flights and space stations, studying space from low Earth orbit.

For NASA there were nine more Saturn V rockets waiting to launch Apollo 12 through 20. It didn’t turn out that way. Even before Apollo 13 failed, Apollo 20 had been cancelled so its Saturn V could be used to launch Skylab. Even before Apollo 14 landed, Apollo 18 and 19 were cancelled. Why? Because it was a stunt from the get-go. Apollo 11 had met the deadline. To coin-counting bureaucrats, that was enough.

For those of us who see space exploration as the future of humanity, Apollo 11 was only the  beginning. Lunar exploration, a moon base, Mars, Venus — there should have been no end.

Bureaucrats did not agree. The program was cut short.

<< — >>

Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt landed on the moon December 11, 1972, in the Taurus-Littrow region of the moon. This site allowed sampling a wide range of types of rock, as it consisted of an ancient lava flow, with surface broken by subsequent meteor strikes, and included secondary strikes. This means that ejecta from the nearby Tycho crater had come to earth (come to Moon?) causing secondary, smaller craters at the Taurus-Littrow site. This allowed Schmitt to sample Tycho material even though an Apollo landing at Tycho never happened.

A few minutes before eleven PM, Greenwich Time, December 14, 1972, the last manned mission to the moon lifted off, to later rendezvous with the CSM and return to Earth. Gene Cernan was the last to enter the lunar lander before take off.

We’ll give him the final words, spoken years later:

“Too many years have passed for me to still be the last man to have left his footprints on the Moon. I believe with all my heart that somewhere out there is a young boy or girl with indomitable will and courage who will lift that dubious distinction from my shoulders and take us back where we belong. Let us give that dream a chance.”

And now, we’re going back. It’s about time. Thank you to all who did not lose faith.

719. Winning a War

I have over a dozen novels waiting to be published, and once in a while I fire one up and read it again on my computer. It isn’t entirely self-indulgence, although if you don’t enjoy reading your own writing its time to take up a different art form.  In my case it is half enjoyment and half polishing. Every read-through finds dozens to hundreds of tiny changes that make the novel read more smoothly.

I have recently been re-reading my novel The Cost of Empire, an alternate reality story in which the Brits won the German War, their equivalent of our WWI. In their world that war came a half a century early and was won mostly by the actions of a secret group of spies, saboteurs, and assassins.

Now this Britain all but rules the world. Our hero has found out about the league of spies, has gotten himself on their hit list, and has gone underground.

Today — March 23, 2026 — I reached ms. page 203 where he is musing about how he got to where he is. He says of his country:

Winning a war is one thing: surviving the peace that follows is another, particularly when all the world hates you.

God, does that sound familiar. And timely.

— << >> —

Here are two propositions for you to consider:

The United States is a beacon to the world, showing what democracy can mean for its people.

The United States is a hungry beast, treating the little countries of the world as its prey.

Neither proposition is true all the time, but each of them is true sometimes.

We could start looking at how the nation was formed, although that gets awfully complicated for a short post.

Yes, the land was already occupied by “savages”. That wasn’t a word restricted to North America. In early days it basically meant non-Christian, and was applied to the whole non-European world. Before we sympathize with the natives too quickly however, we need to remember that most of the pioneers who took over Indian land were escaping from tyranny.

No, I am not talking about the tyranny of King George III. North America was well populated by Europeans before George III’s grandfather was  born. I am referring to the tyranny of European landlords — the rich of their day who controlled the land and reduced the people who worked that land to serfdom, whether or not that term technically applied.

Could the European populating of America have been stopped? No. Do I wish for a different outcome? No. Nevertheless, it is the ground base of our culture, the source of our pride, and the birth of our legends. We tell ourselves that we won because we were a superior people, endowed with the rights of free men.

Good enough. I make no arguments with American pride, as long as it is tempered with a clear vision of what else we have done over the years.

For instance, we might consider the Mexican War of 1846-8, in which the United States force-purchased New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah, along with parts of Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma, all at the point of American guns.

We might also remember the with Spanish-American war of 1898. It began with America supporting Cuba’s revolt against its Spanish masters. The Senate disavowed any intention of taking control of Cuba, but when the treaties were signed after the war, America had nevertheless gained control of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines.

But not Cuba. 128 years later, Trump wants to remedy that.

Old news? How about the war your grandfathers fought in Viet Nam, a fourth rate country that should have fallen in no time, but defeated the giant — us. Or the ten years spent in Afghanistan, before we pulled out.

Who could have guessed such things could happen?

The answer is, any guy. We all know the story. The school bully beats up every kid in the class, and finally picks on the littlest, least, and last — and gets his head handed to him. For the bully, it was just fun; for the little guy, it was life or death.

Multiply that by a million and you have the US taking on third or fourth rate nations, and losing. When you declare victory and vacate, no one is fooled.

I say it again:

Winning a war is one thing: surviving the peace that follows is another, particularly when all the world hates you.

That is, if you can even win the war.

718. History Repeats Itself

NEWS FLASH

I write these posts far in advance, then polish them repeatedly, which makes it hard to keep up with fast moving news. Two posts were scheduled for today and next week so that they would come one year before the release of a book. That will have to change. I have two things I need to say, so the scheduled posts will both get bumped forward, along with a general reshuffling of the next dozen.

This all started two days ago when I ran into a situation that called for a response to the ongoing war against Iran. It led me to write the post that you will see next week.

Then, three hours later on the same day, the news reported that Trump said he was negotiating with Iran, and Iran said they weren’t negotiating with him.

Really?

History seems to be repeating itself, so now I have to write this post.

I’ve seen this movie before, but not many people have, so let me explain. I grew up in north-eastern Oklahoma, which was the land assigned to the Cherokees. I learned all the cliches then, and later acquainted myself with their actual history.

The Cherokees came from the eastern United States, largely Tennessee and Georgia. During the first half of the 1800’s they lived in cabins not very different from their white neighbors, raised crops in similar ways, held slaves, and intermarried with whites. John Ross, their principal chief, was seven-eighths Scottish.

Nevertheless, their white neighbors wanted their land, and President Jackson wanted them, and most of the other tribes, out of the United States. He offered the Cherokees land across the Mississippi in exchange for their homeland, in an area owned by the United States but not part of any state. It came to be called Indian Territory, and later Oklahoma.

The Cherokees didn’t want to go.

Cherokees were divided in many ways, as human groups usually are. Some were unable to speak English and lived as closely as possible to the old ways. Some were more integrated into the white world.

That exact same sentence could be used to describe their white neighbors, if you slip in the word “proper” just before the word “English”.

There were factions among the Cherokees, with differing responses to the idea of removal. Jackson found a faction he could buy off, signed a treaty with them, then sent the Army to move the entire Cherokee nation whether they agreed with the treaty or not.

That is a lot of history to cram into 220 words, but it is essentially factual, if short on detail.

So what does that have to do with Trump repeating history? He says he  is “negotiating” peace with someone, but won’t say who. We have to guess, while also considering that it might be an outright lie.

It isn’t the Iranian government (unless they are flat out lying), but possibly some disgruntled diplomat, someone who wants out of the war, or someone who can be bought off. Like Jackson with the Cherokees.

So here are the choices we face:

One, Trump is actually negotiating with someone in authority and a treaty will come out of the process. I give that a 1% or less chance of being true.

Two, Trump is actually negotiating with someone who has no authority, and any treaty coming out of the process will be bogus. That is history repeating itself.

Three, there are no real negotiations, just another smoke screen.

The chances of a positive outcome don’t look good.