Category Archives: A Writing Life

74. Writing vs. Storytelling

yol 2Your Own Language, 2: Writing vs. Storytelling

Here is a confession. I’ve never read Harry Potter. I’ve tried, but I could never get through the first book; the writing was too dull for me. It would have been fine for a romance, or a modern slice-of-life, or even a western, but fantasies need to sing. At least in my universe.

A Potterfanatic friend of mine tells me that the movies follow the books extremely well, and I find the movies superb. Whatever I think of Rowling’s writing style, she is a first-class storyteller.

We have to judge Homer entirely on his storytelling, since no one has ever heard his original delivery.

Shakespeare is noted for both language and storytelling, and I don’t dispute it. But just between us, if you took one of his comedies with its misunderstandings and cross-dressing disguises, and stripped it of its beautiful language, wouldn’t it look at home on I Love Lucy?

Pavane, by Keith Roberts, is one of my favorites for beauty of writing. If you read the reviews on Goodreads, you will find a strong division between those who praise the beauty of his writing and those who find him confusing, disorganized, and sometimes lacking in believability. I can’t buy that, because his writing trumps any weaknesses in storytelling – for me.

In my own writing, if I had to choose I would take beauty of writing over storytelling. But we don’t choose; we strive for both.

Of course, it’s all artificial. Analysis always is, but analysis is a useful tool if you don’t let it get in the way of creativity. Critics use analysis to tell us how we screwed up, and rarely, what we did right. We use analysis to try to catch our faults before they can.

What about you? This series of posts are meant for would-be writers, not casual onlookers. Which side of the writing vs. storytelling dichotomy do you come down on?

Try this experiment. Choose a favorite novel, then look it up in Goodreads and read at least thirty reviews. You might want to beware of the respondents who are young readers just getting their wings, but you will probably find most of them to be mature and intelligent. It can be eye opening to see how many different ways readers react to the same work.

There are masterpieces that everybody loves and dogs that can’t find a friend, but I find the mid-rated books most instructive. They tend to have their advocates and detractors arrayed around the notion of beauty of writing vs. strong storytelling. I can usually see both viewpoints even when they are trouncing one of my favorites. Or praising something I find unreadable.

Here is another experiment. Try it if you dare. Take the twenty books you most love, the ones which have changed your life. Look them up in Goodreads. If everybody hates what you most love, you may not be destined to be the next Stephen King.

Or not; you never know.

73. Your Own Language

    YOL 1 Welcome to 2016. I have been dense-packing this website with nine posts per week since mid-2015, in support of the upcoming release of Cyan, the novel which signals my return from the graveyard of forgotten writers.
     Science fiction readers tend to be closet or would-be writers themselves. With that in mind, the next eight posts in A Writing Life will be an unabashed how-to series.

Your Own Language
first post of 8

I have spent the last fifty-five years perfecting the ability to write in a dead language – grammatical English.

Before you close me out without reading further, let me assure you that I fight back against English grammar as much as anyone else who deals with it daily. The grammar books of my childhood and youth were of little use in learning to write well; the ones I saw during my years as a teacher were positively harmful. Most of what they taught needed to be unlearned to avoid becoming a mental cripple.

I have come to these two conclusions about English.

  • Those who slavishly follow grammatical rules end up sounding like pretentious fools.
  • Those who ignore grammatical rules end up sounding like ignorant fools.

As Kirk said to Spock, the truth lies somewhere in between.

I grew up on a farm outside a tiny town in Oklahoma. The version of English my people spoke did not follow Strunk and White, but it still had rules. You would never say to a friend, “Y’all come over after work.” Only ignorant Northerners said that when mocking us. You would say, “Come over after work,” or, “Would you like to come over after work.” In the South, you is second person singular and y’all (you all) is second person plural, a grammatical nicety far superior to the way standard English collapses singular and plural into a single word.

It wasn’t standard grammar, but it was grammar nonetheless, and if you didn’t follow the rule, you looked ignorant.

If I had planned to be a farmer, I would simply have talked like everybody around me. It is a valid dialect, capable of great expressiveness. But I had decided to go to college to become a scientist, so I had to master standard English.

Try that is a tiny town in Oklahoma in the fifties. I dare you.

Fifty-some years, two master’s theses, and many novels later, I’m still working at it. Here are some of the things I’ve learned along the way.

  • There is no such thing as Standard English.
  • What I took for Standard English and spent a lifetime mastering was only a snapshot of a continuously changing scene.
  • The language I made my own, has largely disappeared.
  • What typically passes for English today is as chaotic as a bowl of alphabet soup, but . . .
  • If you choose a typical passage written in 1950, or 1900, or 1850, or 1800 it will be equally chaotic.
  • Chaotic or not, readers read and understand the writing of their own era. And pay for it, if it’s interesting or exciting.
  • Generally speaking, so-so writers make more money than really wonderful writers, if they are also excellent storytellers.
  • You have to create your own version of English.

72. New Year on a New Planet

Welcome to 2016. Even though my upcoming novel Cyan has been moved back to an April release date, some of the Cyan related posts are tied to the solar calendar. For example . . .

Why do we start our year on “New Years Day”? The Chinese don’t. Traditional Jews don’t. Islamic nations don’t. Our New Year might make some sense if it started on an equinox or a solstice, but it doesn’t.

Where does a circle – or an orbit – start? Silly question; it doesn’t. Yet we have seasons, and seasons make the year. Where we start counting the days of that year is arbitrary. And if there were no seasons, as on Cyan where there is no axial tilt . . .

Gus Leinhoff, one of the first explorers of Cyan, said:

The philosopher observes that the life of a man is like the passing of the seasons, from springlike birth, through the autumn of age, and winter’s death. In spring’s rebirth, year after year, the philosopher’s metaphor becomes the prophet’s revelation, as we try to see a new life for ourselves after the death that awaits us all.

What philosophies and religions might come out of this planet of endless springtime, and how will our children understand the briefness of their own lives without the endless cycle of seasons to provide a metaphor for their understanding.

Perhaps Gus worried too much. Humans are resilient, and the DNA evolved by a billion years on Earth cannot be reset quickly. Twenty years after the first colonists arrived on Cyan . . .

The long days and seasonless years had begun to seem normal, even to the oldest colonists. There was a whole generation of Cyan-born children, nearly thirty thousand of them now, who had known nothing else. The humans weren’t quite emulating a yeast culture, but they were multiplying fast.

Birthdays were artificial reminders of the yearly rhythms of old Earth. They served no practical function on Cyan, but they had become important rituals, just as the old, nearly abandoned holiday of Xmas (or Christmas as some extreme purists still called it) had been revived to mark the end of a year. An Earth year, that is, which was the only kind of year anyone memorialized.

A trip around Procyon where nothing changes can hardly be called a year.

71. New Year, New Century

DSCN4794The end of the year is my favorite season. Whether you are Christian or not, the story of the birth of the Christ child is also the birth of hope, the birth of joy, and the birth of innocence. We need all those things in our world. I have come to love this season more now than I did when I was a child.

Add a sense of the world’s renewal at the turning of the year that comes to us from the pagan roots of our Christmas festivals, and it all becomes pretty magical.

I have already spent time celebrating the year’s end as we Westerners see it. Now, on the last day of the year, I would like to turn toward the East, to a land beyond the land of the Magi.

*****

Rabindranath Tagore is a Bengali writer who won the Nobel prize for literature in 1913. He is largely unknown in America, and for good reason. His work is hard going – not because of difficuty of language (there are plenty of translations), but because it is the product of a spiritualism that is beyond the American norm. America loves it’s gurus; we all know that. But the ones who make it here tend to have a gift for sound bites, an easy pop-psych message, and a face the camera loves.

Tagore was glitz free.

When I was studying Anthropology, my subject area was South Asia. I ran across Tagore’s poem Sunset of the Century in a textbook, and was so taken by it that I quoted part of it when I wrote A Fond Farewell to Dying, and quoted it again as the sub-title of this website.

At sunset, December 31, 1899, Tagore looked at his land, crushed under a hundred and fifty years of British domination, and looked forward to the new century which he hoped would bring India its freedom.

Here is the excerpt I quoted in Fond Farewell:

Be not ashamed, my brothers, to stand before the proud and the powerful.
With your white robes of simpleness.
Let your crown be of humility, your freedom the freedom of the soul.
Build God’s throne daily on the ample bareness of your poverty.
And know that what is huge is not great and pride is not everlasting.

That last line is probably my favorite quotation of all time. The complete poem is in today’s Serial post.

70. The War is Over

240px-Wildfire_near_Cedar_Fort,_Utah Every era has its terrors. Throughout my childhood in the fifties I was deeply aware of the likelihood of nuclear war. I was fifteen during the Cuban missle crisis. When I went to college, Viet Nam was well underway.

As I mention today in Serial, I tried my hand at folk music. I even wrote a song, which no one has heard for the last 45 years. I wish I could call it the melancholy thoughts of youth but, sadly, it’s still spot on.

The War is Over
Syd Logsdon

Now that the last war is over
Now that the violence is done
Search through the rubble for mourners
You will find — not a one.

Now that the green grass is dying
Now that the trees are stripped bare
The sounds of the forest are silent
The brooks have no laughter to spare.

The moon still hangs sad and silent
The stars fill the heavens with light
The sea rolls so dark and so lonely
Over cities where ruins now lie.

Look for your friends in the mountains
Or your enemy’s spoor on the plain
Run through the corridor shelters
Seek a companion in vain.

Cry out your soul for a songbird
But none will answer your call
Search for your friends and your loved ones
But they’re gone — one and all.

Search for the one called the victor
Through the still smoking rubble and ruin
Now that the violence is over
Now that the war has been won.

69. Site Tour

IF YOU HAVE ONLY BEEN DIPPING INTO THIS WEBSITE, THIS WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO ACCESS SOME THINGS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED

But first, an announcement. My upcoming novel Cyan has been delayed. It will be out in April or May, not in January as originally promised.

This has left me scrambling. About a dozen Cyan related posts which were scheduled for December and January had to be replaced with new, seasonally appropriate material. All that is done now, and things have calmed down.

So now —– welcome to the five cent tour.

This is post sixty-nine in the blog A Writing Life. The site is also called A Writing Life, which may cause some confusion. Since this is my first website, I learned as I went and not all my early decisions were the best.

This site has been up since August 31, with an arrival page called Welcome to my Worlds and two separate but related blogs. That was an early choice I have never regretted, although I’m sure some should-have-been followers have clicked in at the arrival page and never found either blog. No plan is perfect.

I had a backlog of material which I wanted to present in serial form, so my second blog was called Serial. There is another blogger’s rule: simple and straight forward is good; cute, clever, and confusing is bad.

As of today, there have been eighty-eight posts under Serial. So far I have presented a previously published science fiction novella (To Go Not Gently), a science fiction short story (Into the Storm), a vignette (Koan), two fantasy short stories (Blondel of Arden and The Best of Lies), a non-fiction piece (How to Build a Culture) and an excerpt from a contemporary novel (Symphony Christmas).

All of the above have been removed from Serial; otherwise, the slide from latest post to earliest post would take endless minutes. There will be one more fantasy short story, Prince of Exile, beginning next week, then Serial will morph into something different. Check it out in mid-January.

Except for Symphony Christmas, all the pieces removed from Serial have been moved to Backfile. They can be found on the Backfile drop-down menu, along with two other pieces that were never placed in Serial. They have all been returned to first-to-last order, but the original blog divisions have been retained as virtual chapters to make navigation easier.

If you actually click on Backfile, you will find a page with an annotated list of its final contents, divided into Fiction, Non-fiction, and Poetry. Clicking on a live poem will take you to the A Writing Life blog where it appeared. The other poems entries will be made live as they appear in posts. Five will be activated during December.

Library is an annotated list of my novels. About and Contact are just what you would expect them to be.

Wander around and enjoy yourself.

Filler

This week there will be posts Tuesday through Friday, to allow me to post on New Year’s Eve and Day.

Today, and during the rest of this last week of the year, I’m taking a hiatus, sort of, on the companion blog Serial by placing some of my favorite works by others. My fantasy short story Prince of Exile will begin there on Monday, Jan. 4th.

68. Nostalgia

Dec 25thAs a sort of disclaimer, let me assure you that Christmas Day, and the season that precedes it, is my favorite time of the year. I love everything about it, but that doesn’t keep me from also seeing it slantwise.

“It’s coming on Christmas, they’re cutting down trees . . .” It seems to be a sad and bitter beginning, but Joni Mitchell’s River is all about nostalgia, and so is American Christmas in the twenty-first century.

This goes deeper than surface appearances. The obvious nostalgia is for rural life and all its simplicities – clean snow, red barns, white farmhouses and a one horse open sleigh. In reality, there is nothing nostalgic about walking to the barn in the pre-dawn darkness to face three hours of chores at five below zero. Never mind; when I see that perfect scene on a Christmas card, I want to be there. Childhood memories of frozen feet don’t stand in the way.

Christmas literature today has come to mean movies. I know that there are new Christmas books every year, but they all seem to fall into a soupy genre I can’t bring myself to read.

Among movies, the original is A Christmas Carol, in all its iterations. It stands alone, a whole genre all by itself, and there is no nostalgia in it. No one wants to go back to the age of “prisons, and Union workhouses”, cold, hunger, and early death. Instead, the story is about the change in Scrooge as he considers the horrors faced by those around him, many of which are his own fault. The horrors don’t go away, except for the few people Scrooge can help, but Scrooge himself is redeemed.

Recently, there have been a spate of TV movies all asking, “will the girl get the guy by Christmas”? I leave them with that soupy genre of books, readily available for those who can stomach them, after pointing out that they have nothing to do with Christmas.

The rest of Christmas movies fall into one category, with one masterplot. They range from silly to profound, but they all have this in common: Santa is accused of assault, or loses his memory, or decides that he doen’t want to be Santa any more, or Santa Jr. doesn’t want to take over for Santa Sr..

Santa, and/or those around him, are on the verge of losing faith, but they are saved at the last minute by _______. Choose a crisis and a salvation, and write you own screenplay.

Don’t get me wrong. I love these films; I watch them all season. They have to be really bad for me to turn one off. But what is the one thing are all these movies nostalgic about? Faith, of course, which so many people today are clinging to by their fingernails.

If Santa stands in for Jesus – and even those who wish he didn’t, know that he does – then every time Santa once again proves himself to be real, that version of Christianity which proposes a warm, loving, all seeing, yet forgiving God is reaffirmed.

Those who are afraid to doubt out loud can sit back and let Santa, acting as a stand-in, reaffirm their faith.

I’ll buy in. For another Christmas season I will set aside my unbelief and bask in the feeling that someone out there will make all things come right.

Now get out from in front of the television; Miracle on 34th Street will be on in twenty minutes.

67. ‘Twas the Night . . .

220px-Diedrich_Knickerbocker

Everybody reads Washington Irving in college because he is IMPORTANT. Almost nobody reads him afterward for pleasure. Sleepy Hollow and Rip Van Winkle live in our racial memory, but nobody actually reads the stories.

I tried to read Knickerbocker’s History of New York and liked it as far as I got. However it was a satire disguised as a history, so I couldn’t enjoy it as fiction and I couldn’t trust it as history. My pleasure died of whiplash.

What does this have to do with Christmas? A great deal, actually. In his “history”, Irving included a dream in which

St. Nicholas came riding over the tops of the trees, in that self-same wagon wherein he brings his yearly presents to children

This is apparently the first introduction into American society of Sinterklass, the Dutch version of St. Nicholas from which our Santa comes. Others took up the banner. We will look at them below, but first let’s see what else Washington Irving did for Christmas.

In 1815, Irving moved to England, and five years later published his Sketch Book. Five of the chapters from that work, frequently published separately today as Old Christmas, extolled the nostalgic joys of the old, rural Christmas traditions of England. Widely read in the United States, it was instrumental in giving Christmas respectability at a time when it was reviled by the religious establishment and degenerating into drunken rowdyism among the working classes. 

Irving was a prominent member of the Knickerbockers, a conservative group opposed to the rise of the mob – that which most of us call democracy. They were particularly horrified by the excesses and vandalism of Christmas as it was practiced at that time. They worked to move the center of celebration from the street to the home.

In 1809, Irving published his History on St. Nicholas’ day. In 1810, the Knickerbockers released a broadside extolling St. Nicholas for his bringing of presents to good little girls and boys – and punishment to the rest. A poem about him appeared that same year. I won’t inflict all of it on you, but the last two lines tell you enough.

From naughty behavior we’ll always refrain,
In hope that you’ll come and reward us again.

Twelve years later another poem called the Children’s Friend was published, with “Santeclaus driving his reindeer o’er chimneytops” and giving gifts to the good little children, but still leaving a switch for the parents to use on the rest.

There is little question that Clement Moore, a Knickerbocker since 1813, knew Knickerbocker’s History, Old Christmas, and both poems when he wrote a poem of his own combining all the happy elements and leaving out the preaching and punishment.

A Visit from St. Nicholas, which we usually call ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas, was the result. Ironically, a group of grumpy, nostalgic elitists who loved order and discipline and hated democracy, eventually gave us a poem which would enthrall children for the next two hundred years.

*     *     *

The poem Children’s Friend is just good enough to be amusing rather than repulsive. You can see a facsimile of an original copy at http://pastispresent.org/2009/good-sources/christmas-treasures-flip-through-the-pages-of-the-children%E2%80%99s-friend/ .

Here it is in plain type. I would be surprised if you like it, but it may give you a greater appreciation of what Clement Moore made of the same materials.

Children’s Friend

Old Santeclaus with much delight
His reindeer drives this frosty night.
O’er chimneytops, and tracks of snow,
To bring his yearly gifts to you.

A steady friend of virtuous youth,
The friend of duty, and of truth,
Each Christmas eve he joys to come
Where love and peace have made their home.

Through many houses he had been,
And various beds and stockings seen,
Some, white as snow, and neatly mended,
Others, that seem’d for pigs intended.

Where e’er I found good girls or boys,
That hated quarrels, strife and noise,
I left an apple, or a tart,
Or wooden gun, or painted cart;

To some I gave a pretty doll,
To some a peg-top, or a ball;
No crackers, cannons, squibs, or rockets,
To blow their eyes up, or their pockets.

No drums to stun their Mother’s ear,
Nor swords to make their sisters fear;
But pretty books to store their mind
With knowledge of each various kind.

But where I found the children naughty,
In manners rude, in temper haughty,
Thankless to parents, liars, swearers,
Boxers, or cheats, or base tale-bearers,

I left a long, black, birchen rod,
Such as the dread command of God
Directs a Parent’s hand to use
When virtue’s path his sons refuse.

Yeah, me too! Same as you, I’ll stick with The Night Before Christmas.

 

66. Five by Dickens

DSCN3975 Everybody knows the story of Scrooge. Everybody from Alistair Sim to the Muppets to his namesake duck has played him. I won’t waste your time talking about the story, but have you read him?

Everybody knows Dickens, but did you like him when you met him? I didn’t, in high school. Great Expectations was the most boring, pointless, excruciatingly unending experience of my reading life. My only expectation was that it had to end eventually, and my only hope was never to have to read Dickens again.

A Christmas Carol isn’t like that at all. It is a joy to read.

Marley was dead, to begin with. There is no doubt whatever about that. The register of his burial was signed by the clergyman, the clerk, the undertaker, and the chief mourner. Scrooge signed it. And Scrooge’s name was good upon ‘Change for anything he chose to put his hand to.

You can’t beat writing like that. And it’s short; it makes its point and shuts up.

There seems to be something magical, or at least natural, about novella length. A Christmas Carol and The Old Man and the Sea were both novellas, and either would have been destroyed if it had been stretched out to novel length.

(TOM&TS a novel? Forfend! You’d need the heart of a bookseller to make that claim.)

Dickens was in financial and artistic trouble when he wrote A Christmas Carol and it was the making of the rest of his career. You can get the whole story of its origin from either The Man Who Invented Christmas by Les Standiford or Inventing Scrooge by Carlo De Vito.

A Christmas Carol was prefigured by the story of Gabriel Grub, chapter 29 of The Pickwick Papers, a story within a story which is often reprinted separately today under the title “The Story of the Goblins Who Stole a Sexton.” Old Grubb was so miserable that he chose to spend Chrismas night in a graveyard to avoid human contact. Goblins caught him there and put him through miseries which led to his redemption. The parallel is obvious.

After the ringing success of A Christmas Carol, Dickens wrote another Christmas novella during each of the succeeding four years. These five little books were published together during Dickens lifetime as Christmas Books. That version, with original illustrations, is avaliable from the series The Oxford Illustrated Dickens.

That volume often appears in bookstores seasonally, but you don’t have to seek it out. There will be some kind of Dickens Christmas collection every year. I have in front of me A Christmas Carol and other Christmas Classics, 2012, Fall River Press, which has the five novellas and seventeen other Dickens seasonal stories. Again, however, there is nothing special about any particular version. The stories have been around a hundred and seventy years and they don’t change.

Yesterday, I saw this year’s version in Barnes and Noble, leather bound, red, with gold and white pen style illustrated cover. This version is called A Christmas Carol and other Christmas Stories. It looks like the kind of book you would put in the living room to impress your snooty guests, but the stories inside don’t care about the cover.

As a point of honesty, I slipped into the B&N website just now to confirm my memory. This version was the 300th book that came up when I searched Dickens Christmas. Obviously more people buy Dickens than read him.

A few years ago I decided to read one of the other stories each year at Christmas time. That isn’t as logical as it seems, since Christmas is not a time of leisure. I eventually got through three and a half of the other four. I read The Chimes first and enjoyed it. It was something of a Christmas Carol reprise, and not as good as the original, but worth reading. A Cricket on the Hearth was once the most popular of these books. I didn’t get through it, not because I wasn’t enjoying it, but because that was the year time did me in. I still plan to read it someday. Maybe June would be better. The other two were worthwhile but not earth shaking.

For the sake of completeness, the Dickens Christmas books, in order, are:
     A Christmas Carol
     The Chimes
     A Cricket on the Hearth
     The Battle of Life
     The Haunted Man